Israel is today like a bait

Israel is today like a bait that has been tied down in the path of the murderous beast. The beast of Islam has been threatening to devour the bait (Israel) for the last five decades since 1948. The beast repeatedly lunges at the prey through bomb blasts at Bus Terminals, Pizza Parlors, Shopping Malls, Settlements, Discos, ripping into shreds what were till then innocent school kids, housewives, office goers, and civilians of all persuasions.

Israel is the sentinel of Civilization facing the wild frontier of Islam. The survival of Israel and the destruction of its enemies is the first requirement to defeat the Islamic Jihad.

Israel stands in the way of the march of the Islamic Jihad towards the Western World. In the unlikely scenario where Israel is destroyed, the wild beasts of the Islamic Jihad will run riot across Europe, that has already been infiltrated by Muslim hordes who have been multiplying manifold using the womb bomb to eventually swamp Europe with the Muslim menace and eliminate all non-Islamic denominations be they Christian, Post-Christian or non-Christian.

What makes Israel unbearable is the fact that Muslims have always been at the forefront of grabbing non-Muslim lands and declaring themselves to be legitimate and permanent Muslim land once it fell prey to the claws of the Muslims. Israel is one case of the reverse being true. Muslims want to drive Jewish people out of the Holy land, and re-occupy it, although the land originally belonged to the Jewish people during Biblical times.

Israel is today, like a fishbone stuck in the Arab throat, and howsoever hard the Arab try they have not been able to spit out Israel from the Middle East.

The Inquisition was a reaction to Muslim tyranny

Some misplaced historians say that Islam’s tolerance (sic) has allowed non-Muslims to live and thrive under Muslim rule as Dhimmis (Zimmis). They misguide us by claiming that Jews lived in peace during the Muslim occupation of Spain. We need to clarify here about the Spanish Inquisition that came later after Muslim occupation and the Moriscos (Moors) were thrown back in to North Africa. The inquisition did wrongly persecute the Jews as it also wrongly persecuted some Christians alleging that they practiced witchcraft.

But the Inquisition itself was a result of Muslim rule and the forcible conversion of Visigothic Christians of Spain to Islam by the invading Moors. The Inquisition was severe and many mistakes had taken place especially with respect to the Jewish citizens of Spain after the Reconquista, but nothing in the Inquisition came even remotely close to the chilling horror of Islam where all citizens of a defeated adversary were slaughtered and after a victory all able-bodied males were beheaded if they did not accept Islam, women were raped and the country tyrannized into becoming Muslim.

In Israel we see today the same Muslim mentality in the form of suicide (genocide) bombers who blow school kids to bits, slaughter youth who are as discos, blow up restaurants, and indulge in other similar despicable acts of horror.

The most mind-numbing part of this blood-chilling horror is that Muslims dance on the corpses of those innocents whom they have murdered, they hold aloft body parts of their victims, and find glee in chewing the liver, hearts and other organs of their victims. No, Sir nothing, nothing at all has made humans so depraved as Islam has.

The history of Muslim animosity against Jews goes back to the days when Islam was founded. The first attack on the Jews was at the Battle with the Jewish tribe of Banu Quraizah (Ben Koresh)

After losing the battle of Mu’ta in the year 629 with the Christian Rumis (Arabic for Romans aka Byzantines), Mohammed turned on his favorite enemy the Jewish tribe of Banu Quraizah (Ben Koresh). He had in the inception of his claims to being a prophet of some god, has tried to court favor with the Jews by telling them that he had accepted Moses and Abraham as earlier prophets, he being the last one. He also asked the Kiblah (direction of prayer) to be in the direction of Jerusalem. Later when the Jews refused to accept him as a prophet, he changed this direction from Jerusalem to Mecca (after the conquest of Mecca) and then added Jesus as the recognized apostles of god. He had shrewdly till then, to win favor from the Jews, not included Jesus, whom the Jews did not accept.

As the Jews kept resisting his claim as a prophet, he decided to teach them a lesson. He started with the richest of the Jewish tribes the Banu Quraizah (Ben Koresh) who had earlier promised to help Mohammed if the Quraish attacked him. But they gave only half hearted help during the three battles at Badr, Uhud and Trench, so now Mohammed wanted his revenge on the Jews.

He decreed that the Jews had violated the terms of their agreement with the Muslims, and were guilty of high treason they could no longer be allowed to live in Medina. They were ordered to lay down arms and migrate elsewhere. The Jews ridiculed the proposal. So Mohammed besieged their citadel. The siege lasted for twenty-five days. On the last day, Ali carried the citadel by assault. All the Jews were taken captive. Mohammed’s verdict was that all male adults of the Banu Quraizah should be killed in cold blood, their women and children should be sold off as slaves and their property distributed among the Muslims. The Jews were then hacked to death, their heads were sawn off and the heads were piled before Mohammed, much in the same way as Mohammed’s true inheritors, Zarqawi (whom we have hunted down) and gang do today!

Other Jewish clans like the Banu Nadir, the Banu Qaynuqa and twenty other smaller Jewish clans who had been inhabiting Arabia in the 7th century were converted by force to Islam in the subsequent years. But many of these Jewish clansmen who refused to convert were murdered en masse. By the year 634, there were hardly any Jews left in the Hejaj.

Lessons from the Battle with the Jewish tribe of Banu Quraizah.

Here Mohammed’s ruthless and bloodthirsty nature became evident. He exulted in the mass murder of the Jews and told his followers that appropriating the property and the women of the Jews was a legitimate booty for the Muslims. This was the practice the Muslims carry with them to this day, and any non-Muslim unfortunate enough to fall into the hands of the Muslims is beaten to death, as happened with the IDF soldiers of the Israeli army who were lynched at the beginning of the second Intifada of the Palestinians.

Since the days of Mohammed, it has been an hoary and a popular ghastly practice for the Muslim to dismember the bodies of the murdered enemies and carry body parts as souvenirs, dance over the corpses of slain enemies and distribute candy whenever Muslims kill non-Muslims. This is what we witnessed in across the Arab world and especially among the Palestinians on 9/11.

What has checked Islam so far?

Some historians’ misguide us by falsely alleging that Muslim rulers were charitable towards the non-Muslim subjects and protected them. This is a canard that should be burnt at the stake. Muslim rulers began to compromise with their Christian subjects only when the sword of Reconquista and the Crusades stopped, defeated and rolled back the murderous Muslim hordes out of Europe.

This has a lesson for us today. Islam can be defeated only by the sword, or rather by the Neutron bomb. Any one listening at the Pentagon?

When Islam was weak, the pre-Islamic Arabs, Persians, Byzantines did not unite to defeat it

It is a travesty of History that none of the powers realized how dangerous Islam was to their existence and to human civilization. And so none of the powers co-operated with each other to defeat Islam when it was weak during its inception. It was left to the pre-Islamic Arabs, (the Quraish) to do this job single-handedly. They did their best, they failed, and they realized that the only hope they had of survival was in joining the Muslims and consequently we had the Jihad.

Today Islam is still non-nuclear, we hope and pray that the Presidents, Prime Ministers of USA, UK, would be supported by those of France, Germany, Russia, China etc to unite and defeat and destroy Islam before it acquires nuclear capability and threatens human civilization with destruction. Islam can destroy the world, so destroy Islam before it gets the capability to do that.

Barbaric Outlook of desert nomads, institutionalized into Islam

We saw how the desert Bedouin nomads before the birth of Islam were made hardy by the tough environment of the barren and featureless desert. But it was Mohammed (yimach shmo ve-zichro - may his name and memory be obliterated), who recognized the advantages of such an outlook of the Arabs and made it part of Islamic morality. Mohammed preached that it was proper and moral for a Muslim (Arab) to grab the property of the defeated people, to tyrannize them into accepting Islam, to take the ladies of the conquered people as concubines. Mohammed (yimach shmo ve-zichro - may his name and memory be obliterated) himself had more than ten wives. Before the birth of Islam, the Arabs had been having internecine wars amongst themselves. But these were limited to an occasion.

Although there were occasions for internecine warfare among the pre-Islamic Arabs at the drop of a hat due to the touchy and highly temperamental nature of the desert nomads, due to their harsh environment and hard life. But after becoming Muslims, they made this temperament of theirs a creed, which was used to sustain a perpetual warfare against all non-Muslims, to convert them to Islam at the pain of death.

The Muslim Arabs unleashed a perpetual war on the world at large to impose their own religion, language, and warlike, sadistic and cruel mentality on all those who were unfortunate to fall into the path of these beastly invaders. Thus all converts to Islam also ended up becoming like desert nomads – quarrelsome at best and murderous at worst.

The Myth of Muslim Invincibility

When this murderous mentality which was inherent in the Bedouin Arabs was raised to a level of a religious duty of every Muslim Arab, they fell upon their rich prosperous neighbors like the Zoroastrian Sassanids of Persia and the Christian Byzantines. With their murderous Muslim mentality, due to which they valued human life very cheaply, made them fearsome psychopathic murderers both on and off the battlefield. They had no compassion or compunction in killing their adversaries by the thousands, even after the adversaries had surrendered. This flummoxed many of their adversaries who came into conflict with Muslims for the first time.

The Muslims were not only desperate, they were also sadistic and murderous. While their adversaries were brave and chivalrous. Neither the Persians, nor the Byzantines, nor the Chinese, nor Hindus, nor the Visigoths of Spain had indulged in wholesale slaughter of their adversaries just for the sheer pleasure of killing.

Till the Muslims came on the scene, conquerors like Julius Caesar, Hannibal, Cyrus or Alexander, fought to win. They treated a defeated adversary honorably. The fighting was confined to the battlefield. But with the coming of the Muslims on the scene, all this changed. Here were invaders with an outlook, which raised mass killings to a holy creed, every beheading was met with exultation, and death of an enemy was always a cause for hysterical celebration from the very first days of Islam.

This is the only reason, why the Muslims acquired the reputation of being feared warriors, while actually they had a beastly mentality that glorified killing for the sake of sadistic pleasure. This perversion in the mentality of the Muslims gave them their fearsome reputation.

This mentality of theirs coupled with the psychological conditioning received over generations of living in a barren environment devoid of all pleasures of life made them go overboard with their avarice and savagery when they had at their mercy their prosperous neighbors whom they could now loot and rape at will. This increased their fanaticism manifold to vanquish their civilized and refined adversaries.

Only when the Muslims encountered an equally determined foe as they did in the Franks at Poitiers who slaughtered 200,000 Muslims in one battle itself or the Nubians (Southern Sudanese) who with their skillful use of archery in their forested homeland, successfully blinded the invading Arabs, did the Muslim Arabs face defeat. The only other examples of Muslims facing defeat were at the hands of the Crusaders and the Mongols, both of whom outdid the Muslims in their savagery in warfare. The Crusaders are reputed to not only have slaughtered all Muslim men, women and children, but also to have roasted and devoured their victims. But only the Mongols, under Hulagu Khan established a new level of mass carnage that surpassed that of the Muslims. Only such foes could defeat the Muslims.

Muslim Fantasy about repeating their earlier successes in the 21st Century

Muslims leaders and especially Osama Bin Laden have fantasized that the way the terror armies of Islam using foul tactics, horrendous cruelty, mass slaughter, secured victory after victory in their halcyon days boast that this history is about to repeat itself. They say that the way the early Muslims faced two empires the Persian Sassanian and the Byzantine Roman empires, but both empires fell before the truculent armies of Islam, so will the powers of today fall.

They gloat that the way ancient Sassanid Persia succumbed to Islam in just seventeen years from 634 to 651, is comparable to the way the former USSR accepted defeat at the hands of the Mujahideen in Afghanistan from 1979 to 1986 – a period of seven years and then the Soviet Union itself collapsed in 1991. But the Byzantine Empire fought on for eight hundred years from 634 to 1453, when Constantinople fell to the Muslims, so will the USA fall to the Muslims, but after a longer struggle, or so Osama and his gang fantasize, a feeling that is reflected in the mentality of the all Muslims when they gloat that Islam will dominate the globe.

We need to tell these Muslim gloaters that in the near future, the history of the Muslims will resemble that of the Nazis, although on a much larger time frame. The way the Nazis attacked on two fronts simultaneously – Poland and France. While they overcame Poland in a matter of days, France took a few months to surrender to the Nazis. Then there was a lapse of many years from 1939-40 to 1943-44, when the world united against the Nazis till all the Nazis were wiped out to the last man.

The fate of the Muslims will be similar to that of the Nazis, but on a far larger scale. Like the early victory of the Nazis over Poland and France, the Muslims defeated both the empires – the Persian Sassanian and the Roman Byzantine in the early part of their Jihad. Then there was a lapse of many centuries from 1453 to 2001. Now the world is finally uniting against the barbarism of Jihad and these united forces will slowly but surely act to vaporize the Muslim world into radioactive dust, till the last of the accursed Muslims is wiped out from this planet.

This may sound mad to many readers today, but when this eventuality happens in the not too distant future, please do recollect that you had read this here. The destruction of Islam is certain and that it will be violent is also equally and definitely certain.

This may sound mad to many readers today, but when this eventuality happens in the not too distant future, please do recollect that you had read this here. The destruction of Islam is certain and that it will be violent is also equally and definitely certain.

There are ominous similarities between the Muslims and the Nazis. The Quran and the Mein Kamph both stressed on aggression, occupation and tyranny. The Muslims killed non-Muslims in their millions, so did the Nazis with the Jews of Europe. Islam is based on a paranoia, so was Nazism. Nazism was violently destroyed, so will be Islam.

Strategy for Israel to destroy Hezbollah:

In Southern Lebanon, the Hezbollah has dug in into underground tunnels and chambers its murder squads of four to five terrorists each that would pin down the IDF and fight to death. Now that most of the civilian population has fled, the best strategy for the IDF is to withdraw from Hezbollah held territory and flood it with oxygen sucking gas to flush the Hezbollah out of their foxholes or to let them suffocate inside. After a gap of 24 hours the IDF can walk in take control. We presume, the Hezbollah do not have emergency oxygen supply to outlast a gas attack for more than a few hours. So this is the best bet for the IDF without losing its precious soldiers against blood-thirsty Hezbollah death squads.

The next step would be to treat Northern Lebanon the same way and then Syria and then…you gassed (oops sorry we meant guessed) it - Iran.

Remember the Muslims only understand the language of blood and death and that is why Nasrallah is making noises of stopping his missiles, he knows his end game is near. Israel needs to use smart tactics as spelt out here. Morons like Kofi and the Jacques Chirac will moan, but ignore them, they are inconsequential, when it comes to saving IDF soldiers lives and defending Israel’s right to exist.

Time tested technique to drain the swamp of Terrorism

Hiroshima and Dresden proved how to drain that swamp of the most committed Kamikaze Samurais and of the ghoulish Nazis. Like the Samurais and the Nazis, the Muslim Jihadis of today, after all also come from a community - the Muslim Ummah. And when that community is threatened with extinction, the guerillas surrender or die.

What if Israel does not exterminate the Mullahs of Iran, before they develop a useable A-bomb

- Ahmedinejad will no longer fear that Israel has the nerve to repeat Osirak and he will be brazen in deeds and not just words.
- Impression amongst Western nations that Israel is not goingto be consistent and decisive when it is faced with an existential threat.
-The Mullah Jihadis will gloat overt their having increased the centrifuges from 30 to 6000 and brazenly increase their arsenal further without fear.
- They will go full steam ahead with their nuclear program. comfortable in the thought that their enemies are chickening out. They would develop an arsenal to destroy the entire Civilized World!
- After developing nuclear weapons the Mullah Jihadis will lend their arsenal to the Hezbollah and Hamas terrorist organizations to be used to destroy Israel.
- They will be emboldened to be less circumspect with their, so far tacit, links with Al Qaeda (remember their giving refuge to Mohammed bin laden (Osama's son) and other Al Qaeda thugs) .
- They will be emboldened to finance terrorist strikes more openly across the globe (remember their financing of the Hezbollah in Lebanon).
They will launch their first terror nuclear strike against Israel and make good Ahmadinejad's (I-am-a-dumb-jackass') boast that Israel will be wiped off the map
- The destruction caused after an Iranian nuclear attack, will put Masada and the Gas Chambers in to the shade.
- The Mullahs will also be emboldened to strike the US surreptitiously with more chemical weapons (remember the Anthrax attacks in 2001).
- Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas and other Terrorist organizations will be emboldened to strike Israel in a way that would be even more devastating than any terror attack launched so far aganst Israel by Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade or Islamic Jihad.
- Other Islamic terror sponsoring states like Sudan and Syria, will also be emboldened to defy and strike at the US and the West.
- It would be a psychological defeat for the West in general, and for the USA in particular, and a psychological victory for terrorism.
- A nuclear armed Iran will put the oil reserves of the Gulf under their sway. They could easily bring down governments in the Gulf or force the Sunni Arab regimes to fold them into the hegemony of Shiite Iran.
- This new cartel will force up the price of oil to 300 USD per barrel. Ahmedinejad has already said that oil is under priced at its current level of 120USD. The high price of oil will fill the coffers of Iran with petro-dollars.
- The Arab states in the Gulf would also benefit from the surging oil revenues and simultaneously acquire an alibi to develop nukes themselves. The petro-dollar glut in the coffers will make this task easier.
- The widespread acquisition of nuclear capability by the Islamic world will reduce the clout of the USA in the region. Saudi Aramco will be a thing of the past. The newly resurgent Arab-Iranian nuclear club will embolden, inspire and encourage Islamic radicals in the various Islamic communities.
- Home-grown Islamic terrorists in turn, will be inspired to launch destructive terrorist attacks on the West by the new found confidence that the acquisition of nuclear weapons by the Muslim Ummah is a providential sign of the coming “victory of the true believers over the infidels”.
- The nuclear deterrence of the West over the terrorists would be lost forever. The age of nuclear terrorism will be upon us making 9/11 seem like kid-stuff.

- A nuclear armed Iran would snowball in to a threat to the entire world and bring Armageddon from biblical myths to being a scorching reality!

To save itself and the Civilized World from annihilation, Israel needs to act now and strike Iran before June – the last month for clear weather over Iranian skies. Metaphorically speaking the year 2008 corresponds to the situation in 1938 and Iran is Germany and it is racing to acquire nuclear weapons. Well, if that is the case, then we will soon be in 1939!

Realization of this reality is slowly dawning upon a cross section of world leadership. Now with Iran having successfully testted its first satellite that can be used for guiding its nuclear capable missiles, even the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said that Iran is a threat that needs to be tackled. Interestingly during her presidential campaign she had said that she is ready to "obliterate" Iran. Hence the belligerent statement of Ben Eliezer, the Israeli National Infrastructures Minister to destroy the Iranian nation. Its fireworks ahead folks, and the earlier the better.

But Iran is not going to take things lying down. To beat the Iranian counterattack, we need to guard against a presumed Iranian EMP attack on the USA, simultaneous terror attacks on the American homeland using dirty bombs or conventional suicide bombers. The Hezbollah has been sharpening its claws to strike not only against Israel, but also against many European and American targets.

In the light of Iran's open pursuit of nuclear technology and declaration of belligerent intent, President George Bush has issued a strident new warning to Iran hinting at the consequences. "This behavior is completely unacceptable," he said during a press conference at his ranch in Crawford, Texas.

Mr Bush said that Iran was undermining the push for peace in the Middle East, which is delicately poised after promising overtures last month.

Iran's nuclear ambitions are looming particularly large over the region. Israel warned yesterday that Iran "is trying everything" to get a nuclear weapon, and that if it succeeded it would threaten a far wider theatre than just the Middle East.

Incidentally, on December 14th, 2001, just three months after the heinous acts of 9/11, Rafsanjani delivered a speech to mark “International Day of Quds (Jerusalem)” in which he stated “The establishment of Israel is the most hideous occurrence in history. The Islamic world will not tolerate the continued existence of Israel in the region, and will vomit it out from its midst.” Later on in the speech, he commended Islamic terrorists for their important work and concluded by openly advocating the use of atomic bombs against the Jewish State: "The Jihad operations against Israel must continue unrelentingly until victory is achieved … when the Islamic world acquires atomic weapons, the strategy of the West will hit a dead-end — since the use of a single atomic bomb has the power to destroy Israel completely, while it will only cause partial damage to the Islamic world.” He has also attacked America on numerous occasions, accusing it of “doing evil”, committing “atrocities”, and even threatened the US by saying that their opposition to Tehran’s nuclear program will be “America’s suicide”. Sounds a lot like Ahmadinejad - except for one thing: Rafsanjani currently has an international warrant out for his arrest due to his involvement in terrorism.

This much for Iran's peaceful intentions for its nuclear project!

The Mullah Jihadis are also quietly and meticulously planning a fifth column in the Western World, as another front of their asymmetric warfare. It is high time the US and the West opened its eyes to the happenings around them and give up the delusion they would not have to fight their forthcoming war against Islamic Iran. The Mullah Jihadis are getting ready for it. The world needs to learn that whenever they had their way the Jihadis have moved through an unsuspecting and ill-prepared victim nation like a hot knife through butter; now if human civilization is to be saved, then it is high time for that butter to turn into lava so as to melt the knife of the Islamic Jihad. A knife which is today being given a nuclear edge at Isfahan, Bushehr and Natanz.

To counteract this before it is too late, our principle is simple. Kill massive numbers of the enemy to give them a choice death or surrender. This option works in all wars – the point is when will the Muslims hurt America enough for us to give the Muslims that option, as we gave the Germans and Japanese in 1945. Only when we do that, will the swamp of Islam be drained.

A case for War Against Iran

Seven recent developments have brought us closer than ever to war with Iran:

• Events from Iran show that the various hard-line principlist factions and their “independent” allies who dominate the Majlis with roughly 80% of the seats in their hands will rule the roost. The testting of the satellite do make the prospects of a negotiated settlement with Iran less likely.

• On April 25th, the U.S.’s top military officer, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael Mullen, said that the U.S. is planning for “potential military courses of action” against Iran. Mullen also said that Tehran was complicit in the death of American soldiers and was an “increasingly lethal and malign influence” in Iraq. Defense Secretary Robert Gates made similar comments a few days prior.

• On April 23rd, it was announced that Gen. David Petraeus will be nominated to take over as chief of U.S. Central Command (the head of all U.S. forces in the Middle East). Petraeus, a fierce critic of Tehran’s activities in the region, will be replacing Adm. William Fallon who stepped down after appearing to criticize the Bush administration’s hard line on Iran.

• The Russian news service RIA Novosti reported that Russian intelligence has information that the U.S. has completed preparations for a military strike against Iran and that everything will be ready for an attack just before Iran can take its nuclear arsenal to a critical mass for a devastating series of strikes. The testing of the Iranian satellite is a step taking us closer to that eventuality.

• A report to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee revealed that if the Iranians were permitted to acquire nuclear weapons, the Saudis and Turks would almost definitely follow suit. Pakistan’s nuclear weapons already have the world on edge. A handful of additional nations with their very own Islamic Bombs will cause a decrease in regional stability and security that will severely endanger U.S. interests.

• A report by Reuters stated that Tehran has begun to install IR-2 centrifuges at its uranium enrichment facility in Natanz. These advanced centrifuges can enrich uranium at a rate that is two-to-three times faster than that of the centrifuges currently in use. This development further erodes the small window of opportunity that exists to solve the situation without force.

• On his nation’s National Day of Nuclear Technology, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad boasted that Iran has begun to install 6,000 new centrifuges (in addition to the 3,300 already in operation) at Natanz (it is not clear whether they are IR-2 or not). 3,000 fully operational centrifuges running for one year can produce enough fissile material for a nuclear bomb.

An attack on Tehran’s nuclear facilities would not be simple. Iran learned a lot from Israel’s 1981 Osirak strike on Iraq’s nuclear program. The Iranians have spread their nuclear plants around the country and have also built them deep underground and behind thick shields of reinforced concrete.

Assuming that a strike could be successfully carried out, the associated consequences would be very severe and may well consist of any number of the following:

• The 350,000+ American and foreign troops, contractors, and mercenaries stationed on Iran’s borders in Iraq and Afghanistan will almost certainly be targeted in some way as part of Iran’s response; as will Israel and nations in the Gulf and Caucasus that have a hand in the attack.

• Parts of Europe, all of Israel, and the Middle East (including the Gulf nations’ oil installations) are within the range of Tehran’s ballistic missiles.

• Iran has established biological and chemical weapons programs.

• Iran’s terrorist proxies could also be activated:

-- Iran’s militias in Iraq will cause as much havoc as possible, undoubtedly erasing all the security gains made in the past year.

-- Israel can expect to be attacked from all sides by Tehran’s proxies with Hezbollah’s Katyushas raining down from the north and Hamas/Islamic Jihad striking from the east and south.

-- Iranian funded Shia militias could also cause mayhem and unrest among the Shia populations in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

-- Terrorist attacks against Western and Israeli targets in South America (where Hezbollah has extensive terror networks and has struck on behalf of Tehran before), Europe, Africa, and Asia might also be part of the retribution.

• Iran can retaliate against the Strait of Hormuz, through which 30% of the world’s oil passes, sending the price of oil skyrocketing and dragging the economy down with it.

But what would this attack really accomplish? Domestically, the Iranian people, under attack, will presumably “rally around the flag.” In all likelihood, there will also be a vicious crackdown on all forms of dissent and opposition to the regime.

All of this, to, at best, set the nuclear weapons program back a decade.

Of course, if it comes down to bombing Iran or allowing their elementary school dropout Supreme Leader and his apocalyptic President to get within a button’s click of setting the world on fire, there really is no choice at all. So, in spite of all of the associated consequences, military action must truly be the best resort.

Why Hezbollah and Hamas can claim victory after they are mauled by Israel?

Lets personalize this issue. When a murderer strikes at you, he is successful when he murders you. But when you stop him in his tracks and deliver him bound to the law, the murderer is not yet dead and he is free to commit another murder some day. So the murderer by remaining alive can claim victory. This is how and why Hamas and Hezbollah can claim victory when they survive an Israeli attack.

Moral of the Story: A murderer is finally defeated when he is seated on the electric chair or given the lethal injection or in some countries hanged to death as Saddam was. So also a Hamas and Hezbollah will be defeated only when they are physically destroyed to the last man and woman. But then Hamas and Hezbollah are a part of the seamless whole we call the Muslim Ummah. So the murderer is the Muslim Ummah, and we cannot bring this murderer to book, unless the entire Muslim ummah is sent to its grave, save those who see certain death and come to their senses by abjuring Islam, or those who have today secretly abjured Islam but are scared to death to declare that openly, but do so when their jailors (the Muslim community) is fast disappearing into radioactive vapor.

_____________________________

* For those uninitiated, PBUH expands to Perpetual Battle Upon Hagarism (Islam) – founded by the mass-murderer and pedophile pretender prophet Mohammed-ibn-Abdallah (Yimach Shmo – May his name and memory be obliterated).

______________________________________

Select Bibliography The Mummy, Funeral Rites & Customs in Ancient Egypt, by Ernest A. Wallis Budge, reprint of 1893 edition by Senate Studio Editions 1995

The Twilight of Ancient Egypt, First Millennium B.C.E., by Karol Mysliwiec, translated by David Lorton, Cornell University Press2000

Egypt in The Age of Cleopatra, by Michel Chauveau, translated by David Lorton, Cornell University Press, 2000

Women in Ancient Egypt, by Gay Robins, Harvard University Press, 1996

Women and Society in Greek and Roman Egypt: A Source Book by Jane Rowlandson, Cambridge University Press, 1998

The Chronicle of John Coptic Bishop of Nikiu (circa 690 A.D.), translated by Robert Henry Charles, reprint from 1916 edition, APA-Philo Press Amsterdam, Holland

The Vanished Library, A Wonder of The Ancient World, by Luciano Canfora, University of California Press

The Story of The Church of Egypt, Volumes I and II, by Edith L. Butcher, reprint of 1897 edition by AMS Press Inc, New York, N.Y 1975

Coptic Egypt, by Murad Kamil, Le Scribe Egyptien, 1968

Traditional Egyptian Christianity, A History of the Coptic Church, by Theodore. Hall Patrick, Fisher Park Press, 1999

Muslim Extremism in Egypt, The Prophet and the Pharaoh, by Gilles Kepel, University of California Press 1993

Ancient Egyptian Culture, published by Chartwell Books, Edison, N.J. 1998.

Pre-Islamic Kabiliyan Berbers

Samson Blinded: A Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict, by Obadiah Shoher

Jihad in the West: Muslim Conquests from the 7th to the 21st Centuries (Hardcover) by Paul Fregosi

The Sword of the Prophet: History, Theology, Impact on the World by Srdja Trifkovic

Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World's Fastest Growing Faith by Robert Spencer

Studies in Muslim Apocalyptic (Studies in Late Antiquity and Early Islam) by David Cook

Why I Am Not a Muslim by Ibn Warraq

Onward Muslim Soldiers by Robert Spencer

Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis by Bat Ye'Or

Islam and Dhimmitude: Where Civilizations Collide by Bat Yeor

What the Koran Really Says: Language, Text, and Commentary by Ibn Warraq

Islam and Terrorism: What the Quran Really Teaches About Christianity, Violence and the Goals of the Islamic Jihad by Mark A. Gabriel, Mark A. Gabriel

A Concise History of the Crusades by Thomas F. Madden

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) by Robert Spencer

The Great Divide: The failure of Islam and the Triumph of the West by Marvin Olasky

The Myth of Islamic Tolerance: How Islamic Law Treats Non-Muslims by Robert Spencer

Islam Unveiled: Disturbing Questions About the World's Fastest Growing Faith by Robert Spencer, David Pryce-Jones

The Koran (Penguin Classics) by N. J. Dawood

Don't Keep me Silent! One Woman's Escape from the Chains of Islam by Mina Nevisa

Christianity And Islam: The Final Clash by Robert Livingston

Holiest Wars : Islamic Mahdis, Their Jihads, and Osama bin Laden by Timothy R. Furnish

The Last Trumpet: A Comparative Study in Christian-Islamic Eschatology by Samuel, Ph.D. Shahid

Unleashing the beast: How a fanatical islamic dictator will form a ten-nation coalition and terrorize the world for forty-two months by Perry Stone

Contemporary Muslim Apocalyptic Literature (Religion and Politics) by David Cook

Islam and the Jews: The Unfinished Battle by Mark A., Ph.D. Gabriel

The Challenge of Islam to Christians by David Pawson

The Prophetic Fall of the Islamic Regime by Glenn Miller, Roger Loomis

Prophet of Doom : Islam's Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad's Own Words by Craig Winn

The False Prophet by Ellis H. Skolfield

The Approach of Armageddon: An Islamic Perspective by Muhammad Hisham Kabbani

The Cube and the Cathedral: Europe, America, and Politics Without God by George Weigel

Infiltration : How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington by Paul Sperry

Unholy Alliance : Radical Islam and the American Left by David Horowitz

Unveiling Islam : An Insider's Look at Muslim Life and Beliefs by Ergun Mehmet Caner

Perfect Soldiers : The Hijackers: Who They Were, Why They Did It by Terry McDermott

Islam Revealed A Christian Arab's View Of Islam by Anis Shorrosh

Leaving Islam: Apostates Speak Out by Ibn Warraq

The Origins of the Koran: Classic Essays on Islam's Holy Book by Ibn Warraq